Legal Opinion

United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NY

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1931No. 21PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This writ brings under review a supplemental decree making allowances for attorney fees, expenses, etc., in a suit, instituted by a next friend, to recover and preserve a trust fund belonging to Jackson Barnett, an incompetent Creek Indian, and directing that the allowances be paid from that fund. The allowances are challenged by the United States as in conflict with existing restrictions on the disposal of the trust fund, and as excessive.

Barnett is a full-blood Creek Indian, so enrolled, who received an allotment out of the Creek tribal lands when they were divided in severalty pursuant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. The SirenSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. State v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Scott v. BeamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API