Legal Opinion
Miller v. Skumanick
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 2009No. 3:09cv540PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO). Having been briefed and a hearing having been held, the matter is ripe for disposition.
Background
At issue in this case is the practice of “sexting,” which has become popular among teenagers in recent years. (Complaint (Doc. 1) (hereinafter “Complt.”) at ¶ 7). According to the plaintiffs, this is “the practice of sending or posting sexually suggestive text messages and images, including nude or semi-nude photographs, via cellular telephones or over the Internet.” (Id.).…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller Ex Rel. MM v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- B.L. v. Mahanoy Area Sch. Dist.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- State v. LietzauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Victory v. Berks Cnty.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- E.O.H.C. v. BARRDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.