Legal Opinion

Miller Ex Rel. MM v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 17, 2010No. 09-2144PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

In 2008, the District Attorney of Wyoming County in Pennsylvania presented teens suspected of “sexting” with a choice: either attend an education program designed by the District Attorney in conjunction with two other agencies or face felony child pornography charges. Plaintiffs brought suit to enjoin the District Attorney from bringing criminal charges in retaliation for their refusal to attend the education program — an act they allege is constitutionally protected — and immediately filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief. The District Court…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Surender Malhan v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. BotticellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Maureen Mirabella v. Susan VillardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. Kelly Conard v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Singer Management Consultants, Inc. v. MilgramCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API