Legal Opinion

Schippers v. Midas International Corp.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 24, 1978No. Civ. 3-77-379PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This is an action under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) for alleged patent infringement. The defendant has moved to dismiss, or in the alternative to transfer, on the ground that venue does not properly lie in this Court. Briefs have been submitted on this issue and an oral argument has been heard.

The parties have generally stipulated as to the relevant facts. It is the position of the defendant that venue in this action properly lies in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The defendant has represented to the Court that if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Epsco, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Shapiro v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
  4. Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. Millar Bros. & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API