Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Corning Glass Works
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 3, 1985No. CIV-81-894TPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Dr. Charles M. Coleman, the plaintiff in this action, is the owner of the patent for a method and apparatus for separating blood cells from blood serum in a collection tube. On January 18, 1969, Dr. Coleman entered into a license option agreement with the defendant, Corning Glass Works, in which Coleman granted to Corning an exclusive license for the development of a commercial integrated blood serum separator under his patent. Plaintiff and defendant worked together on that project until September 25, 1972, when Corning terminated its…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ces Publishing Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. St. Regis Publications, Inc. Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- H & R INDUSTRIES, INC. v. KirshnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Wafer Shave, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Estate of O'ConnellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- In Re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.