Legal Opinion

Dorr Et Ux v. Janssen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages for alleged fraud in the sale of a cattle ranch. The plaintiff-purchasers appeal from a directed verdict for the defendant-vendor.

The transaction out of which this litigation arose began with an exchange of property. The purchasers, hereinafter referred to as Dorr, exchanged certain equities which they owned in Oregon real property for an equity in the vendor’s ranch in California. The vendor, hereinafter referred to as Janssen, was to be paid the sum of $165,000 for the difference between the agreed value of Dorr’s interests in Oregon property and that of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ward v. JensonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Bonded Adjustment Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Anderson v. LawsOregon Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oakland Raiders v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Citizens Nat. Bank v. WaltmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sanders v. UlrichOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Agrilease, Inc. v. GrayMontana Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API