Legal Opinion
Parkdale International v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 17, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-54; Court 05-00316PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
Plaintiff, Parkdale International, a reseller, exporter and importer of corrosion-resistant carbon steel products (“CORE”) from Canada to the United States, moves for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2, seeking review of the final results in Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Canada, 70 Fed.Reg. 13,458 (Dep’t Comm., Mar. 21, 2005) (hereinafter “Final Results”), as amended by 70 Fed.Reg. 22,846 (Dep’t Comm., May 3, 2005). Specifically, Plaintiff and Plaintiff-intervenor, Russel Metals Export (“Russel”), a Canadian reseller…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parkdale International v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Tropicana Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Xiping Opeck Food Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.