Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 18, 2009No. Consol. 07-00475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge.

Plaintiffs United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”) and ArcelorMittal USA, Inc. (“ArcelorMittal”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) challenge the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) decision to use offsetting to calculate the weighted-average dumping margins as such and as applied in certain antidumping duty proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581©. 1 Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin During an Antidumping Investigation; Final Modification, 71 Fed.Reg. 77,722, 77,722 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 27, 2006) (“Section 128…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API