Legal Opinion
State v. Furrey
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 2006No. S-04-1158PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Appellant, Kenneth Furrey, filed a plea in bar to an amended complaint, claiming that the amendment constituted a dismissal of the prior proceedings in which jeopardy had allegedly attached. Furrey claimed the amended complaint was an attempt to retry him in violation of the principles of double jeopardy. The county court overruled the plea in bar, and that determination was summarily affirmed by the district court and the Nebraska Court of Appeals. See State v. Furrey, 13 Neb. App. xl (No. A-04-1158, July 27, 2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. BreanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- State v. BostwickNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. NesbittNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. VasquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KeenNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HumbertNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DragooNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.