Legal Opinion

State v. Humbert

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2006No. S-05-1221PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Carl M. Humbert (Humbert) was charged by information with two misdemeanors and four felonies. He pleaded no contest to the misdemeanor charges and filed a plea in bar asserting that prosecution on the two corresponding felony charges in the information is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the state and federal Constitutions. The district court overruled Humbert’s plea in bar, and he filed this interlocutory appeal.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Issues regarding the grant or denial of a plea in bar are questions of law. State v. Furrey, 270 Neb. 965, 708 N.W.2d 654 (2006). On a question…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. VasquezNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. FurreyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. DragooNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. GrizzleNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API