Legal Opinion

State v. Keen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2006No. S-05-945PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge, Retired.

NATURE OF CASE

In the county court for Sarpy County, John F. Keen pled guilty to having violated Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 2004) and was convicted of second-offense driving while under the influence (DUI). The enhancement to second offense was based on a DUI conviction Keen received in 1998 under Omaha Mun. Code, ch. 36, art. Ill, § 36-115 (1995). In county court and on appeal to the district court, Keen unsuccessfully maintained that the 1998 conviction could not be used for enhancement purposes because it was not a “[p]rior conviction” as defined in Neb. Rev.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. State v. LouthanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Norlanco, Inc. v. County of MadisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Mayfield v. HartmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MarrsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sanders v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. RoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. TompkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. RatumaimuriNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API