Legal Opinion

Diehl & Sons, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 29, 1976No. 73 C 1436PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

This private antitrust action was commenced on September 24, 1973 by Diehl & Sons, Inc. (“Diehl”) and its subsidiary, Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. (“TRAC”), against International Harvester Company (“Harvester”) and International Harvester Credit Corporation (“IHCC”), its wholly-owned subsidiary. The original complaint has in effect been superseded by a supplemental complaint filed May 27, 1975, in which plaintiffs allege eight causes of action: two claims of § 1 conspiracy in restraint of trade, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and two claims of attempted monopolization,…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Thomas J. Kline, Inc. v. Lorillard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. Frank Reisner, D/B/A Intermeccanica Automobili, and Indra Imports, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation and Adam Opel, A.G.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. H & B Equipment Company, Inc. v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Martin Ice Cream Co. v. Chipwich, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Purdy Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Champion Home Builders Co., and Tamarack HomesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API