Doe v. Quiring
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Jane Doe (Applicant), an incest victim, sought a writ of prohibition to prevent the listing of incest offenders and their offenses on the State’s Sex Offender Registry in Minnehaha County. Applicant contended that because the offense of incest involves familial relationships, the listing would violate a statutory prohibition against the release of “identifying information” regarding victims. The trial court *919denied the writ, concluding that the listing did not constitute identifying information. We affirm.
Pacts and Procedural History
[¶2.] The South Dakota Legislature…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Demar Nilson v. Layton City and Rex BrimhallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Auto Insurance Companies v. B.N.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Klein v. Sanford USD Medical CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Doe v. QuiringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004