Legal Opinion

State Auto Insurance Companies v. B.N.C.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] State Auto insured a vehicle that, while being operated by an unauthorized driver, was involved in a single car accident rendering it a total loss. After paying its insured/owner for the property loss, State Auto brought this subrogation claim against the mother of the minor who was driving the vehicle. State Auto claimed that the mother was responsible on a theory of vicarious liability and on three theories of direct negligence. The trial court rejected all claims and granted summary judgment in favor of mother. We affirm the dismissal of all claims except one…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Sanchez v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Opple v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kirlin v. HalversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Iverson v. NPC International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sorace Ex Rel. Estate of Sorace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Andrushchenko v. SilchukSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. McDowell v. Citicorp U.S.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API