Legal Opinion
Demar Nilson v. Layton City and Rex Brimhall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1995No. 94-4077PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Demar Nilson brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his constitutional right to privacy because a Layton City official publicized an expunged portion of his criminal record. In a bench trial, the district court rejected Mr. Nilson’s claim, and he appeals. We affirm.
I
In 1981, while a school teacher in the Davis County School District, Mr. Nilson pled no contest to forcible sexual abuse charges. Although charged in Davis County, Mr. Nilson was arrested and booked in Layton. The court sentenced him to one year of suspended jail time, indefinite…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hogan v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Yusef Steele v. Warden CicchiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.