Legal Opinion

Hamblin v. City of Clearfield

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1990No. 860289PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs Rick and Cherlynn Hamblin appeal from a summary judgment that dismissed their action against the City of Clearfield. The Hamblins initiated this suit in April of 1985 to recover cleanup costs and compensation for flood damage to their home. This flooding was allegedly caused by changes in surface water drainage that resulted from the construction of a nearby subdivision authorized by the City, as well as from inadequate measures undertaken by the City to handle the changes in drainage. The district court granted the City summary judgment and ordered the suit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Russell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dwiggins v. Morgan JewelersUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Farmers New World Life Insurance Co. v. Bountiful CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API