Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1999No. 49A02-9809-CR-767PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Appellant-Defendant, Jermaine L. Smith, appeals his conviction of theft, 1 a Class D felony, for using a “cloned” cellular telephone reprogrammed to have an internal electronic serial number (“ESN”) different than its external ESN. Put in the vernacular, Smith was convicted of using an illegal cellular phone which had been modified such that, when in use, the charges would be billed to someone else’s active cellular phone number. Smith raises the following restated issue 2 for our consideration:

Whether the evidence gained by state troopers’ field-test of the cellular…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. Hawkins (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. United States v. Jesus UribeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Nick McIlquham v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API