Legal Opinion

Ransom v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 2000No. 49A04-0005-CR-199PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Senior Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Anthony Ransom was charged with unlawful possession of a handgun. He brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the handgun.

We reverse and remand.

ISSUE

The following issue is dispositive: whether the trial court erred in denying Ransom’s motion to suppress the handgun on the basis that the initial stop of Ransom’s vehicle was lawful and that Ransom’s consent to the search of the vehicle was voluntary.

FACTS

The facts, as found by the trial court, indicate that Ransom was driving a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Meredith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Erving Sanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Turner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Brad Kroft v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API