Louchheim, Eng & People, Inc. v. Carson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
In his first two assignments of error the plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in concluding on the basis of the pleadings that the plaintiff made a campaign contribution or expenditure in violation of the General Statutes of North Carolina. The statutes codified under Article 22A which regulate contributions and expenditures in political campaigns are of recent origin and have never been interpreted by the courts of this State. See G.S. 163-278.6-163-278.35 (1976), G.S. 163-278.36 (Supp. 1977). General Statute 163-278.19 reads in pertinent part as follows:
Violations…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Congress of Industrial OrganizationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Jack L. ChestnutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Morris v. . HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re a Declaratory Ruling by the North Carolina Commissioner of Insurance Regarding 11 N.C.A.C. 12.0319Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Odell v. Legal Bucks, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979