Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack L. Chestnut

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 8, 1976No. 316, Docket 75-1268PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

Jack L. Chestnut appeals from a judgment of conviction of causing another to accept and receive an illegal corporate campaign contribution in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 610, 2. 1 After a four day trial before Edward Weinfeld, District Judge, the jury returned a guilty verdict. On June 25, 1975, Chestnut was sentenced to four months in prison and fined $5,000.

Appellant Chestnut offers six arguments on this appeal: (1) that the language and circumstances of the indictment proved the prosecution to be ex post facto; (2) that the indictment failed to state an offense because…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Wilson Arroyo-Angulo, Hugo Gomez, Jaime Rayo-Montano and Guillermo MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Carl BenedettoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Pasquale Panza, Seymour Ringle, Charles Fruscione, Gregory Cappello, Gregory Boutelle, Christopher MerlinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Ronald Lyles, Jesse Johnson, Carlos Holder and Benjamin Dunham, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API