Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2008No. S-07-0231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[11] Appellant, Kacey Allan Gibbs (Gibbs), seeks review of the district court's judgment and sentence, asserting that, because the State violated the terms of the plea agreement entered into by the State and Gibbs, Gibbs should be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas and plead anew. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Gibbs raises this issue:

Should the judgment be vacated and [Gibbs] be allowed to withdraw his plea because the prosecutor violated the plea agreement?

The State views the issue differently:

Did [Gibbs] materially and substantially breach the plea agreement when he violated a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Browning v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ford v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Schade v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Spencer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. SlaymakerWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Judd v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Langberg v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & CompensationWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Christensen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API