Legal Opinion

Spencer v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2005No. 04-100PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, John Franklin Spencer (Spencer), challenges the district court’s decision to impose a sentence that was meted out so as to be served consecutive to a sentence previously imposed in federal court, but concurrent with a sentence that was previously imposed by another Natrona County district judge. The sentence previously imposed in Natrona County was imposed in such a manner so as to be concurrent with the federal sentence. Spencer entered a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain wherein the prosecutor agreed that the sentence in this case would be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RardonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rutti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cardenas v. MeachamWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Manes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Andrew William DeedsWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Wease v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Charles Wayne Palmer, Jr. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API