Legal Opinion

Patton v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 14, 2021No. A169460Published

1Opinion of the Court

262 Argued and submitted June 18, 2020, affirmed July 14, 2021 Lowell E. PATTON, individually and as Trustee, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and PATTON OREGON PROPERTIES, LLC, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. William C. COX, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 17CV17589; A169460

495 P3d 711

Appellant Patton hired respondent Cox, a land use lawyer, to help him develop some property for the purpose of selling it. They agreed that Cox’s com- pensation would be contingent on the development and sale of the property. After 12 years of work, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. KerneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Purdy v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. ParkersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. WaldbilligCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API