Breuer v. Continental Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Plaintiff, the owner of an automobile, was insured by defendant against loss or damage thereto on account of collision or upset. While so insured and on May 25, 1931, the car ran off the highway near Casselton, North Dakota, struck a telephone pole, and was damaged. Defendant was notified of the accident and employed Charles J. Vogel of Fargo to adjust plaintiff’s loss. So far there is no dispute between the parties. But subsequent delays and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lininger Implement Co. v. Queen City Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Wellberg v. Duluth Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Roemhild v. Home Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Lancashire Ins. Co. of Manchester v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Chisholm v. Royal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Interstate Insurance Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. LazereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Mattson v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948