Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Horsey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 29, 1939No. [No. 61, October Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The parties to this appeal present the single question whether, the giving of a note, payable on demand after date, for a pre-existing debt, discharged guarantors of that debt. In a suit by a creditor against the guarantors, a verdict for the defendants was directed at the close of testimony on the plaintiff’s behalf, and from the judgment entered accordingly the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff is a dealer in gasoline, oils, and other merchandise, and in consideration of making a contract with William E. Cohee to sell its wares at a filling station, received from the defendants, on March…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dominion Trust Co. v. HildnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Miners State Bank v. AuksztokalnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Whitcomb v. National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. O'Neil v. MagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Shuman v. Citizens State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Giant Food, Inc. v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Jenkins v. KarltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Waller v. Maryland National BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API