Reninger v. Department of Corrections
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
We are asked in this case to decide if state correctional officers who were disciplined through the State’s personnel process can, after losing their appeals of that discipline before the State Personnel Appeals Board (PAB), state in superior court claims for wrongful constructive discharge or tortious interference with a business expectancy. We hold those officers do not have a cause of action for wrongful constructive discharge under Washington law on these facts and collateral estoppel bars their tortious interference claim. We reverse the trial court’s judg*440ment and remand the case for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Barbara v. Hudson v. James Craven Yvette Jackson Patricia Serrano Katrina Golder David DubackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical ClinicWashington Supreme Court · 1998
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.