Legal Opinion

Billey v. North Dakota Stockmen's Ass'n

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1998No. Civil 970332PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The North Dakota Stockmen’s Association (Stockmen’s Association) appeals from a summary judgment declaring portions of N.D.C.C. §§ 36-09-18, 36-22-03, and 36-22-08 unconstitutional. Concluding brand inspection and registration fees are public moneys which must be paid over to the state Treasurer under North Dakota’s Constitution, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The Stockmen’s Association was formed in 1929, and incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in 1941. Prior to 1949, brand inspection in North Dakota was conducted by county brand inspectors, veterinarians, and the Stockmen’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Whitecalfe v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Home of Economy v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API