Billey v. North Dakota Stockmen's Ass'n
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The North Dakota Stockmen’s Association (Stockmen’s Association) appeals from a summary judgment declaring portions of N.D.C.C. §§ 36-09-18, 36-22-03, and 36-22-08 unconstitutional. Concluding brand inspection and registration fees are public moneys which must be paid over to the state Treasurer under North Dakota’s Constitution, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The Stockmen’s Association was formed in 1929, and incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in 1941. Prior to 1949, brand inspection in North Dakota was conducted by county brand inspectors, veterinarians, and the Stockmen’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Whitecalfe v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Home of Economy v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.