Legal Opinion

Gee v. Security Bank & Trust Co. of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1939No. 28968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action on promissory note and to foreclose real estate mortgage given to secure the same. Judgment was for the plaintiff below, and certain of the defendants have appealed. The parties will be designated here as they were at the trial.

The note and mortgage were executed by Emmett Gee and his wife, Elsie Gee, who were defendants at the trial, but are not parties on appeal. These appealing defendants joined in the execution of the note, but did not join in the mortgage.

The answer and cross-petitions contained a general denial, but admitted the execution of the note, pleaded no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Miller v. Exchange Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merritt v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Parnacher v. MountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Bennett v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Chopping v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company v. MaggiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API