Miller v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
[ELPS, J.
This was an action to -er upon a promissory note in the sum 50,000 given by the defendant Alma r England to the defendant Zack T. r, secured by a real estate mortgage, i note had in turn been assigned by T. Miller to the plaintiff as collat-security for the payment of a note of 30 given by the defendant Zack T. r to the plaintiff. No money judg-was sought against Zack T. Miller, was joined as a party defendant for mrpose of foreclosing any right which ,s pledgor of the Alma Miller England and mortgage, might have in the faged premises, and in order to de-ne the amount due on his note…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Crawford v. HemmingwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gee v. Security Bank & Trust Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Chopping v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- Chopping v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1966