Legal Opinion

Miller v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1937No. 27247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[ELPS, J.

This was an action to -er upon a promissory note in the sum 50,000 given by the defendant Alma r England to the defendant Zack T. r, secured by a real estate mortgage, i note had in turn been assigned by T. Miller to the plaintiff as collat-security for the payment of a note of 30 given by the defendant Zack T. r to the plaintiff. No money judg-was sought against Zack T. Miller, was joined as a party defendant for mrpose of foreclosing any right which ,s pledgor of the Alma Miller England and mortgage, might have in the faged premises, and in order to de-ne the amount due on his note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Crawford v. HemmingwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gee v. Security Bank & Trust Co. of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Chopping v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Chopping v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API