Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh National Bank v. Kemilworth Restaurant Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 188PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal from an order opening a judgment entered by confession on a note dated August 30, 1960, drawn in favor of the appellant, Roth Rug and Carpet Company, as payee, signed as follows:

“Kemilworth Restaurant Company, Inc.

Homer H. Dasey (Seal)

'Laura W. Dasey (Seal)”

The note was. negotiated, to a third party, the Pittsburgh National Bank (Bank) which caused judgment to be entered thereon against .both the corporation and Laura W. Dasey, individually (Homer H. Dasey having died ‘ previously). Subsequently, the note and judgment were reassigned to the original…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. BorishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Vallish v. RapoportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pollin v. Mindy Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Kilgallen v. KutnaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Bailey v. PolsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Bell v. DornanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN GARLAND v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API