Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Polster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1971No. 17647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

This is a suit to enforce the terms of a compromise settlement of bodily injury and property damage claims. Thomas and Doris Peterson and their minor son Vincent were injured and their automobile damaged in a collision with an automobile owned and operated by one Eddie Thomas, Jr. The appellee Commercial Standard Insurance Company (herein called Commercial Standard) was notified and, acting under the mistaken belief that it had insured Eddie Thomas, Jr. against such liability, negotiated a settlement of the claim with the appellant Claire E. Bailey, the attorney representing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Texas Land & Cattle Co. v. Carroll & IlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Pollin v. Mindy Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Benson v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Dallas Farm MacHinery Co. v. Minneapolis-Moline Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singer v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Frickleton v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Canal Insurance v. First National Bank of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Friendly National Bank of Southwest Oklahoma City v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Canal Insurance v. First National Bank of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API