Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. Borish

Opinion by

Fine, J.,

This appeal is from an order of the court below making absolute a rule to open a judgment entered for want of an answer. The appellant company, Brown & Bigelow, complains, inter alia, that Honey Borish, apellee, failed to set forth a valid and meritorious defense in support of his rule and because of that default and of laches the court erred in granting the prayer to open.

Appellant instituted suit in assumpsit for the price of goods sold and delivered to appellee pursuant to a written agreement and a complaint was served on February 24, 1948. On March 24, 1948, judgment…