Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwin A. Neal

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1996No. 94-6002PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether jeopardy attaches to a district court’s dismissal of an indictment upon defendant’s motion for acquittal based on both a legal and factual ground. Because the district court relied exclusively on the legal ground raised by this defendant, we hold that double jeopardy does not bar appeal by the government. We therefore have jurisdiction over the government’s appeal of the district court’s dismissal of the indictment, which we REVERSE for reasons to be discussed.

I

Defendant founded United Security (“United”), with two…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Majestic Star Casino, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Turi v. Main Street Adoption Services, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. CravenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Donald Lynn BaggettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API