Legal Opinion
United States v. Craven
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 6, 2001No. 00-1740PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, the government, qua appellant, protests the district court’s reliance, in granting a downward departure for extraordinary presentence rehabilitation, on an ex parte conversation with a court-appointed psychologist. The defendant, Alfred Craven, resists the government’s appeal and simultaneously attempts to persuade us that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), demands further paring of his sentence. Because Craven has not cross-appealed, his Apprendi- based claim is…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. AntonakopoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Neverson v. FarquharsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re: Kensington International Limited and Springfield Associates, Llc, in Re: D.K. Acquisition Partners, L.P. Fernwood Associates, L.P. And Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in Re: Usg CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- McGuire v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Sullivan v. City of AugustaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.