Legal Opinion

Blumer Brewing Corp. v. Mayer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The principal question for decision is, Did Charles R. Einbeck as surviving partner under the circumstances of this case have authority to continue the partnership business after the dissolution of the partnership brought about by the death of Hugo Einbeck ? The defendants contend that a partnership business may be continued after the death of a partner under the following circumstances and no other: (1) If it is provided by the partnership agreement and such agreement is binding on the estate of the deceased partner; (2) if it is so directed in the will of the deceased partner; (3) pursuant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Williams v. CobbSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Big Four Implement Co. v. KeyserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Mattson v. WagstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Gianakos, Ex'r v. MagirosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. First National Bank of Kenosha v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. McDonald v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Axtell v. Canyon Center Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API