Mattson v. Wagstad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
Were it our duty or disposition to be strict in adherence to rules of procedure there would be many grounds easily found and pointed out supporting an entire reversal of this judgment, instead of the modification *573thereof we have determined to malte. There has been here a long and expensive trial; a want of the proper party in the first instance, namely, the legal representative of deceased, the administrator of his estate; an improper handling and closing of the estate; and a costly reliance upon the incompetent advice and services of an attorney at law. It is proper here to state, although…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rockland-Rockport Lime Co. v. . LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Alexander v. McPeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Schoenwetter v. SchoenwetterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Moyer v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Peterson v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M. & C. Creditors Corp. v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946
- Schreiber v. Kellogg-Citizens National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Blumer Brewing Corp. v. MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Safford v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963