Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1940No. Appeal, 305PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal is from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission in a proceeding instituted upon its own motion. The Commission found that the appellant, the Keystone Transfer Company, a common carrier, in routing and transporting certain freight originating in Pittsburgh and destined for Washington and Uniontown, Pennsylvania via Wheeling, West Virginia, was not engaged in bona fide interstate transportation, but took such indirect route as a mere subterfuge for the purpose of avoiding its jurisdiction. A cease and desist order was accordingly issued as to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Eichholz v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Armour Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Blackmore v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Horn's Motor Express, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API