Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Cook

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 8, 1993No. 93-339PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The original complaint brought by the appellant, Sharon Griggs, against the appellees, John Cook and Petroman, Inc., alleged wrongful discharge and the tort of outrage. This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of appellees. We hold that the appeal from the summary judgment was not timely, and we dismiss the appeal.

From July 25, 1989, until March 18, 1991, Sharon Griggs was employed as a Texaco station manager by Petroman, a subsidiary of Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. Her aunt, Jo Carol Moore, also worked for Petroman. Griggs’s immediate supervisor was John…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Diebold v. Myers General Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. City of Little Rock v. RaganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Murry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Ware v. GardnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Holt Bonding Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Cason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API