Legal Opinion
Holt Bonding Co., Inc. v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 8, 2003No. 02-290PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
Holt Bonding Company, Inc., appeals from a judgment ordering the forfeiture of a $100,000 bond. Holt Bonding claims due process and statutory violations resulting from defective service of process and failure to receive notice. We find no error and affirm.
José Antonio Galindo-Montrel was charged by information filed in Sebastian County Circuit Court on June 13, 2000, Case No. CR2000-523, with the offense of possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver. Holt Bonding posted a bail bond (No. 23-11634) in the amount of $100,000 to insure his appearance in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lord v. MazzanatiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Luckes v. LuckesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Bridwell v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Griggs v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Francis v. Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Wandrey v. EtchisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- FIRST NAT. BANK OF LEWISVILLE v. MayberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Kelly v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- McCormack v. STATE, DEPT. OF FAMILY SERV.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.