Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 2001No. 00-220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), appeals an order reinstating Earnestine Taylor’s lawsuit. Taylor’s lawsuit was dismissed in error by the circuit court for failure to prosecute under Ark. R. Civ. P. 41. There was no failure to prosecute at the time the lawsuit was dismissed. The case was set to be tried within a few weeks. This was the second dismissal of this action, and pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 41(b), it operates as an adjudication on the merits. Hartford Ins. Co. v. Mullinax, 336 Ark. 335, 984 S.W.2d 812 (1999).

Taylor waited seventeen months after the dismissal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lord v. MazzanatiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest v. MullinaxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Diebold v. Myers General Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. City of Little Rock v. RaganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Griggs v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watson v. ConnorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. EddingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Eusanio v. TippinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. City of Little Rock v. McGeorge Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. EddingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API