Legal Opinion

Brownell v. Tom We Shung

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 17, 1956No. 43PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

In Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U. S. 48 (1955), we held that an alien, ordered deported by the Attorney General under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, might test the legality of such order in a declaratory judgment action brought under § 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 243, 5 U. S. C. § 1009. The sole question to be determined here is whether the legality of an exclusion order entered under the relevant provisions of the same 1952 Act must be challenged by habeas corpus, or whether it may also be reviewed by an action for declaratory judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Trump v. J. G. G.Supreme Court of the United States · 2025
  5. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API