Corey v. Webber
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The sole question in this case is whether the plaintiff is liable to the defendants for money coming into his hands, under the circumstances stated below, as in an action for money had and received.
The facts are that on October 14, 1890, the firm of Tripp & Delaney, of Mamaroneck, N. Y., were indebted to one C. T. Cadwell in the sum of 8505.27, and that on that day the firm made its note, payable to the order of said Cadwell two months after date, to secure the payment of said amount. This note was, before maturity, indorsed by Cadwell to defendants, and transferred in the regular course of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Patrick v. . MetcalfNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Walker v. ConantMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Beardslee v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Finn v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Richardson v. Moffitt-West Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hoyt v. Paw Paw Grape Juice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Shultz v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.