Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Boyd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1899No. 18,594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Appellant’s complaint discloses these facts: George W. Shultz on Nov. 1, 1889, procured a life insurance policy payable upon his death. The policy recites that the application is “a part of this contract”. The application and the policy proper were made out upon a printed form. This form consisted of one folded sheet of paper containing blanks for both the application and the policy. In the application appears this question in printing: “Full name of the beneficiary for whom the insurance is desired?” In answer Shultz subscribed “To my legal heirs”. In the printed form of policy a blank was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Patrick v. . MetcalfNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Butterworth v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. McFadden v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Lemans v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Bosworth v. WolfeWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Markworth v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Shirley v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API