Legal Opinion
Trott v. Paciolla
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0815PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff customers Elmer J. and Carolyn G. Trott have filed suit against their broker, defendant Dominick Paciolla, and his two successive employers, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) and Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (“Prudential”) alleging statutory violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b) (West 1981), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (West Supp.1990), the Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1972, Pa.Stat. Ann. tit. 70, §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Smith Barney, Inc. v. HenryMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Qubty v. NagdaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.