Legal Opinion
Allied Corp. v. Frola
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 14, 1990No. Civ. A. 87-462PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
In this suit under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675, plaintiff Allied Corporation (“Allied”) moves for partial summary judgment on the amended counterclaim asserted by defendants James Frola and Albert Von Dohln. In addition, third-party defendants BASF Corporation (“BASF”), Becker Paribas Inc., Exxon Company, U.S.A. and Exxon Research and Engineering Company (hereinafter collectively Exxon), Newton Refining Corp. (formerly Ag-Met Oil Services, Inc.) and Total Recovery, Inc. variously move…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Zaccardi v. BeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Bowen Engineering v. Estate of ReeveDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Mayor and Council v. Klockner & KlocknerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Mobay Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Transtech Industries, Inc. v. a & Z SEPTIC CLEANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.