Legal Opinion

Bristol Belt Line Railway Co. v. Bullock Electric Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 25, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Bristol, rendered January 15, 1903, in an action of assumpsit, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Bristol Belt Line Bailway Company purchased of the Bullock Electric Manufacturing Company a standard Bullock railway generator, and certain other electrical appliances, to be used upon its line of railway in the city of Bristol. The terms of the purchase are stated in a letter from Lozier, district manager of the Bullock Company, to Dulaney, vice-president of the Belt Line Company, dated Hew York, March 2, 1901. After describing the machine which was to be furnished, the letter continues:

“We expect to make shipment of this generator within…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Universal Moulded Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Hamilton & DotsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Quick v. Southern Churchman Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API