Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 13, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The defendant seeks in his appeal a correction of the finding under the method provided in General Statutes, § 5832, which involved the printing of the entire evidence. He moves that paragraph eighteen of the finding be stricken out. An examination of the evidence discloses that paragraph eighteen is an inference from matters in evidence which could reasonably have been drawn.

The motion also asks that the conclusion of the court from the subordinate facts found, stated in paragraph one of part two of the finding, be stricken out. This is an improper method of attacking a conclusion of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Denunzio v. DenunzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. DevineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. CambellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Ford v. HowgateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garden State Plaza Corp. v. SS Kresge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API