United States v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to consider whether the de facto officer doctrine conferred validity upon Laurence Soybel’s participation in the judgment of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) in this case, despite the invalidity of his appointment as a judge to that court. We hold that because the defect in this appointment was not merely technical, but fundamental, the de facto officer doctrine cannot apply.
I. Background
Contrary to Appellant’s pleas, an officer panel convicted him of drunk driving, assault consummated by a battery,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. JanssenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bonilla-Bukhari v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Abbington v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018
- United States v. AnnisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.