Legal Opinion

Reznik v. District Court Department of the Trial Court

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 9, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark Reznik appeals from the dismissal of his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. After Reznik stipulated to the dismissal of a civil action he commenced in the District Court, he moved for relief from judgment pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 60 (b), 365 Mass. 828 (1974). That motion was denied, and Reznik filed a notice of appeal. A judge in the District Court ordered that the notice of appeal and filing fee be returned to Reznik on the ground that, because the case had been resolved by stipulation, there could be no appeal. Reznik seeks relief from this order.

“The court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elles v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Tuite & Sons, Inc. v. Shawmut Bank, N.A.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Driscoll v. T.R. White Company, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Paresky v. Board of Zoning Appeal of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reznik v. GaraffoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Reznik v. YeltonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Reznik v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API