Reznik v. Mendes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
RESCRIPT
Michael P. Johnson and the Massachusetts Appeals Court. The Appeals Court is a nominal party only. See S.J.C. Rule 2:22, 422 Mass. 1302 (1996). The defendants in the underlying litigation, Nicholas Urzia and Miranda Equipment & Contracting, Inc., were not named as parties in the petition, although they should have been. See id .
To the extent Reznik's petition also sought relief from the Appeals Court's decision on the substantive merits of his appeal, and from a decision of the Appellate Division of the District Court dismissing his initial appeal to that court, the single justice…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Elles v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Masterpiece Kitchen & Bath, Inc. v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Fronk v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.